|
|
Post by hellomeow on Jul 29, 2009 16:19:26 GMT -5
Oh he was talking about Tyler's second picture.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Jul 29, 2009 23:19:02 GMT -5
I see it.
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Jul 29, 2009 23:57:31 GMT -5
HAHA WASN'T IT HILARIOUS?
Why are you all like -.- in this thread?
|
|
|
|
Post by matt4862 on Jul 30, 2009 2:04:03 GMT -5
-.-
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Jul 30, 2009 11:20:33 GMT -5
lol Patrick.
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Jul 30, 2009 13:49:30 GMT -5
lol Yeah.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Jul 30, 2009 14:46:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Duvet on Jul 30, 2009 14:51:22 GMT -5
what
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Jul 30, 2009 15:57:36 GMT -5
It's better than Vista.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tex-Mex Alex A. Dex on Jul 31, 2009 14:40:00 GMT -5
Outside of the first couple weeks when it was buggy, there is nothing wrong with Vista (assuming you've updated it since them).
|
|
|
|
Post by matt4862 on Jul 31, 2009 17:17:40 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Aug 1, 2009 0:03:06 GMT -5
Outside of the first couple weeks when it was buggy, there is nothing wrong with Vista (assuming you've updated it since them). Vista was buggy for a long time, and it's still very, very slow in comparison to Windows XP and 7. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Aug 1, 2009 12:38:45 GMT -5
Vista was a travesty performance-wise from Beta to RTM. Service Packs 1 and 2 helped, but it still lags behind 7 and XP in general responsiveness.
|
|
|
|
Post by elbow unit on Aug 1, 2009 16:20:54 GMT -5
it's odd that Microsoft is dropping Windows 7 so....early, it feels like a console cycle or something
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Aug 1, 2009 16:27:40 GMT -5
They needed to rebound from the commercial failure of Vista.
|
|
