|
|
Post by Hauskaz on May 30, 2008 20:25:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Cunt Wrap Supreme on May 30, 2008 21:53:33 GMT -5
Nice Kingston 1gb.
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on May 30, 2008 23:51:49 GMT -5
ENERMAX!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on May 30, 2008 23:56:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Aug 5, 2008 18:56:32 GMT -5
 This Seagate is awful. |
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Aug 22, 2008 15:51:33 GMT -5
the sandisk titanium is only 2 MB?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Aug 22, 2008 22:02:16 GMT -5
Sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Nov 25, 2008 20:36:40 GMT -5
Due to HD Tach's issues with Vista on some machines, HD Tune will now replace it as the benchmarking tool for this chart. www.hdtune.com/ |
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Nov 25, 2008 21:00:19 GMT -5
HD Tach works fine in Vista if you put it in XP compatibility mode.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Nov 25, 2008 21:04:44 GMT -5
Heh, I forgot that existed. Nevertheless, HD Tune is a newer program which is used by sites such as Tom's Hardware (who, in an unrelated matter, gave both my motherboard and power supply Best of 2004 Awards). It also gives you a cooler chart with not only the read speed, but seek time as a scatterplot as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Nov 25, 2008 22:40:29 GMT -5
...Why can we use HD Tune, but not Free CPU Benchmark?  |
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Nov 25, 2008 23:42:14 GMT -5
Because the units are the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Nov 25, 2008 23:47:06 GMT -5
Free CPU Benchmark has a rough inverse relationship with CPUMark, we could estimate a large portion of the results with a good enough equation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Nov 25, 2008 23:56:59 GMT -5
You've yet to find one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daryl on Nov 26, 2008 0:14:47 GMT -5
Insufficient data
|
|
