|
Post by Hauskaz on Dec 15, 2007 19:26:34 GMT -5
(6:37:23 PM) Hauskaz: No widescreen support. (6:37:27 PM) Hauskaz: What a piece of shit. (6:37:39 PM) Kuldeep: works on bros computer (6:37:40 PM) Kuldeep: so (6:37:45 PM) Hauskaz: What resolution? (6:37:45 PM) Kuldeep: that makes your computer a piece of shit:) (6:37:49 PM) Kuldeep: 1600 1200 (6:38:02 PM) Hauskaz: THAT'S NOT A WIDESCREEN RESOLUTION (6:38:05 PM) Hauskaz: JESUS CHRIST (6:38:14 PM) Kuldeep: yes it is (6:38:14 PM) Kuldeep: rofl
1600x1200 is a 4:3 screen resolution.
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Dec 16, 2007 9:19:13 GMT -5
That's his native resolution. Syncmaster 204B.
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Dec 16, 2007 12:46:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Dec 16, 2007 17:17:29 GMT -5
5 ms. It's the same as yours supposedly.
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Dec 16, 2007 17:24:57 GMT -5
My response time is 4 ms, even though the box says 5 for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Dec 17, 2007 18:40:00 GMT -5
Maybe the box tells the truth, and your perception of sex is incorrect.
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Dec 17, 2007 19:07:06 GMT -5
The manual, Samsung's site and many other resources state 4 ms as the display's RTA response time.
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Dec 18, 2007 11:59:20 GMT -5
Well, personally I'd go with the box's opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Dec 18, 2007 12:28:05 GMT -5
Well, seeing as I can notice a substantial difference between my monitor and yours, I'm going to go with 4 ms.
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Dec 19, 2007 11:59:35 GMT -5
My monitor has nothing to do with this. Stop trying to slightly fiddle with the subject.
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Dec 19, 2007 17:29:55 GMT -5
Fine. Also, shitty JPEG compression would have been necessary if I hosted that on Photofuckit.
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Dec 25, 2007 21:35:59 GMT -5
k
|
|