|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Feb 12, 2015 0:10:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Feb 12, 2015 15:51:34 GMT -5
Fuck, that's awfully tempting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Momentum & the Sidesteppers on Feb 12, 2015 17:31:59 GMT -5
>3840 x 2160 at 60 Hz
do not want
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Feb 13, 2015 0:18:14 GMT -5
what's wrong with that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Momentum & the Sidesteppers on Feb 13, 2015 0:59:22 GMT -5
I would prefer to just have a monitor with a higher refresh rate if I was going to go that route. Or just buy a bigger TV that has a higher refresh rate. If I was going to do that I'd just hook up a PC to that thing. 4k is like the least provocative thing in making me want to buy a display. but to each their own.  i believe I've stated this before. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Feb 13, 2015 19:45:13 GMT -5
144 Hz monitors do look pretty damn awesome, as long as it's straight on. In an ideal world, I'd have a UHD display with a high refresh rate and accurate colour representation without burn in. The refresh rate is probably the lowest factor for me though.
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Feb 16, 2015 19:28:09 GMT -5
yeah you posted about that a while ago mahmood. Thing is, every 4k monitor I've seen has been 30 Hz, so seeing a 60 Hz one is pretty refreshing. (lol)
The only issue with this monitor is the size. I already have a 27" monitor. I've always wanted a 30".
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Feb 17, 2015 19:42:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Momentum & the Sidesteppers on Feb 17, 2015 19:51:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on Feb 17, 2015 23:39:40 GMT -5
yeah I have work to do on my computer rofl, TVs are way too big for that
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on Feb 18, 2015 23:22:53 GMT -5
32" is too big I think. 27" would probably be the sweet spot for me, but 30" is acceptable.
|
|
