|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on May 15, 2008 22:10:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on May 16, 2008 23:09:01 GMT -5
The Barrett M82A1 is pretty worthless, despite its guaranteed foot-kill capabilities and powerful scope.
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on May 17, 2008 10:14:18 GMT -5
I need to fucking buy this game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on May 17, 2008 12:25:33 GMT -5
So I can destroy you with the G3, M14, MP44 and M1911A1.
The USP is too bulky and defeats my purposes for a pistol. The M1911A1 and M9A1 are easier to handle in tight areas. They pair up well with the long range heavy-hitting rifles I use. The USP has a range advantage though, so it's nice with a submachine gun or shotgun.
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on May 17, 2008 20:54:17 GMT -5
I will destroy you with the USP and the M4.
Those are my two weapons of choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on May 17, 2008 22:29:47 GMT -5
I used to pair up the USP with submachine guns and shotguns before I got the Desert Eagle. The Desert Eagle's accuracy and stopping power became a great asset with a short-ranged primary weapon.
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on May 18, 2008 9:52:20 GMT -5
lol, fail.
I'll probably never use the Desert Eagle, simply because it looks like shit in that game. It also sounds like shit.
If there is a gun that looks nice and sounds powerful (the USP), I'll gladly use it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on May 18, 2008 11:58:01 GMT -5
I never liked the way the Desert Eagle looks, but I like the strange firing sound it it has. The power and accuracy assets also help a good bit.
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on May 18, 2008 18:50:17 GMT -5
I will still stick to the USP,
at least until I buy the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by matt4862 on May 25, 2008 20:57:36 GMT -5
I own all in cod4 >=D
|
|
|
|
Post by Cunt Wrap Supreme on May 25, 2008 21:01:57 GMT -5
I'm willing to wager you play on a 360.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on May 25, 2008 21:08:38 GMT -5
Console first person shooters are pretty worthless. Even with CoD4's unforgiving health system, the lack of precision aiming on the consoles make it a completely different game. Tactical thinking is not needed as you could run out in the open and probably survive.
|
|
|
|
Post by solocityElectricCyan on May 26, 2008 14:42:34 GMT -5
Tactical thinking is not needed as you could run out in the open and probably survive. Probably? You will. People absorb at aiming, including me. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauskaz on May 26, 2008 15:28:17 GMT -5
Well, with enough people spraying machine guns at your general area, there's a chance a bullet might actually hit you. Rifles and submachine guns are no threat though. Shotguns, RPGs and grenades are probably the biggest dangers, since they never did require precision aiming to be effective.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cunt Wrap Supreme on May 26, 2008 15:34:27 GMT -5
I think you've no idea how slowly your reticule moves on the 360. Kuldeep thinks faster than that thing moves.
|
|
